Nathan Bransford on Dead/Absent Parents

Nathan Bransford wrote a really excellent article about the common portrayal of dead and absent parents in children’s literature. It’s well worth reading his post in its entirety, but I wanted to share just a few paragraphs that sum up his point, and articulate a lot of the thoughts that have been floating around in my head about this topic:

“I’m not a psychologist or an anthropologist or even a cultural historian (though I play one on a blog), but I am a former twelve-year-old, and I can remember how thrilling it was to read books where the kids were off on their own, fighting and outsmarting adults, dealing with harsh landscapes, facing their deepest fears, making unforgettable friendships, and, while I didn’t know it at the time, learning how to be adults.

Around the age the books in this list are so appealing, we’re starting to imagine life without our parents, we’re starting to develop our own opinions and thoughts, and we’re starting to realize that our parents are not always right about everything (eventually we’ll learn that they were right about more than we realized at the time).

Dead parents, I would argue, are an externalization of this nascent independence. We’re starting to imagine life on our own and love to read about kids who have been suddenly thrust into that position. A tradition this common cannot be accidental.”


Sorry, Comments are closed.